I looked up what I thought was comparable burgers from each fast food restaurant and checked the nutrition data posted on the companies’ websites. Here is what I found:
RESTAURANT | SANDWICH | CALORIES | FAT | SODIUM |
McDonald’s | Big Mac | 540 | 29 | 1040 |
In-N-Out | Double-Double | 670 | 41 | 1440 |
Burger King | Whopper | 720 | 44 | 1240 |
Jack-in-the-Box | Ultimate Cheeseburger | 875 | 61 | 1489 |
There are other factors, of course, like the use of trans fats and freshness of the food. In-N-Out wins the fresh-food contest hands down since they don’t freeze their meat. They even cut your fries from a spud while you wait. Regarding trans fats, In-N-Out, Burger King, and McDonald’s all claim to be trans fat free, even though they all have small amounts of hydrogenated oil in their foods.
Jack-in-the-Box is the loser from every angle. The latest research I could find indicates that trans fats are still going full force in their food. (Some Jack-in-the-Box restaurants are now deep-frying their fries in non-hydrogenated oil, but not all.) This restaurant also happens to have the fattiest foods on the menu. Anything that can be deep-fried, is deep-fried. Even their tacos!
So while McDonald’s gets the bad rap on fast food, there are plenty of others that offer even worse choices. My advice is this: eat fast food only sparingly and never go to Jack-in-the-Box.
I also choose In-N-Out for the quality factor. Not only do they not freeze their meat, but I believe it's higher quality. You mentioned the fries, and the fact that it used to be an actual potato only minutes before speaks volumes. The fact that McDonalds engineers their fries and other food is just disgusting to me. I just plain feel better after eating INO that the others. Kudos on the research!
ReplyDeleteKudos
Thanks for the inspiration Bryan! :) The next time you're in Sac, we'll have to go to In-N-Out!
ReplyDelete